Lt Job Lane School
66 Sweetwater Ave Bedford MA, 01730, Middlesex County Phone: 781-275-7606 Ranking: (188 out of 1,316, top 14%)* Type: Regular Primary School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 3 to Grade 5 School District: Bedford School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 44 | 42 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 40 | 40 | |||||||
Total Students: | 533 | 536 | 501 | 534 | 564 | 547 | 539 | |||||||
Grade 3: | 173 | 32.5% | 204 | 38.1% | 147 | 29.3% | 170 | 31.8% | 186 | 33.0% | 186 | 34.0% | 181 | 33.6% |
Grade 4: | 206 | 38.6% | 152 | 28.4% | 174 | 34.7% | 183 | 34.3% | 185 | 32.8% | 185 | 33.8% | 168 | 31.2% |
Grade 5: | 154 | 28.9% | 180 | 33.6% | 180 | 35.9% | 181 | 33.9% | 193 | 34.2% | 176 | 32.2% | 190 | 35.3% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 278 | 52.2% | 276 | 51.5% | 264 | 52.7% | 265 | 49.6% | 283 | 50.2% | 279 | 51.0% | 260 | 48.2% |
Female: | 255 | 47.8% | 260 | 48.5% | 237 | 47.3% | 269 | 50.4% | 281 | 49.8% | 268 | 49.0% | 260 | 48.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 4 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% |
Asian: | 69 | 12.9% | 70 | 13.1% | 53 | 10.6% | 61 | 11.4% | 64 | 11.3% | 53 | 9.7% | 46 | 8.5% |
Hispanic: | 34 | 6.4% | 32 | 6.0% | 28 | 5.6% | 26 | 4.9% | 23 | 4.1% | 26 | 4.8% | 18 | 3.3% |
Black: | 40 | 7.5% | 32 | 6.0% | 28 | 5.6% | 43 | 8.1% | 34 | 6.0% | 33 | 6.0% | 32 | 5.9% |
White: | 371 | 69.6% | 384 | 71.6% | 366 | 73.1% | 379 | 71.0% | 413 | 73.2% | 421 | 77.0% | 426 | 79.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 15 | 2.8% | 17 | 3.2% | 25 | 5.0% | 21 | 3.9% | 28 | 5.0% | 14 | 2.6% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 60 | 11.3% | 58 | 10.8% | 50 | 10.0% | 40 | 7.5% | 36 | 6.4% | 25 | 4.6% | 24 | 4.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 11 | 2.1% | 13 | 2.4% | 13 | 2.6% | 15 | 2.8% | 12 | 2.1% | 13 | 2.4% | 15 | 2.8% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.11 | 12.85 | 12.37 | 13.06 | 13.89 | 13.60 | 13.40 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2003 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 83.2% | 81.6% | N/A |
2007 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 83% | 81% | 59% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 76% | 72% | 56% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 76% | 74% | 57% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 81% | 79% | 63% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 84% | 81% | 61% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 69% | 68% | 61% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 71% | 71% | 57% |
2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 74% | 71% | 52% |
2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 77% | 74% | 60% |
2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 75% | 70% | 61% |
2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 79% | 76% | 60% |
2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 85% | 84% | 65% |
2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 90% | 86% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 70% | 68% | 61% |
2013 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 89% | 89% | 67% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 83% | 82% | 63% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 77% | 76% | 62% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % proficient | 74% | 73% | 58% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 69.0% | 68.5% | 56% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 81% | 79% | 56% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 78% | 50% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 63% | 50% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 74% | 73% | 56% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 69% | 49% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 70% | 53% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 74% | 72% | 54% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 68% | 53% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 67% | 57% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 4th Grade | % proficient | 62% | 60% | 53% |
2003 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 54.8% | 54.5% | 40% |
2004 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 68% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 73% | 41% |
2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 58% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 65% | 48% |
2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 67% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 66% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 62% | 48% |
2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 62% | 60% | 47% |
2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 64% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 65% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 84% | 59% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 82% | 81% | 63% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 85% | 83% | 61% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 86% | 63% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 83% | 80% | 63% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 84% | 82% | 67% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 73% | 61% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 88% | 85% | 65% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 68% | 43% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 71% | 69% | 51% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 76% | 74% | 52% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 75% | 73% | 54% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 77% | 74% | 55% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 79% | 78% | 59% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 70% | 57% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 87% | 84% | 61% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 76.54% | 75% | 52% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 72% | 55% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 78% | 75% | 51% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 70% | 50% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 70% | 51% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 69% | 50% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 66% | 49% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 73% | 71% | 53% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 63% | 50% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 56% | 52% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 68% | 51% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Lt Job Lane School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.